← Back to search

Evolution of the Spin Susceptibility of High-$T_c$ Superconductors

J. Hwang, T. Timusk, E. SChachinger, J. P. Carbotte

arXiv:cond-mat/0610127 · 2006-10-04 · Bulletin of the American Physical Society

T2experimental

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

We demonstrate that a new tool, a model independent numerical Eliashberg inversion of the optical self-energy, based on maximum entropy considerations can be used to extract the magnetic excitation spectra of high-transition-temperature superconductors. In Bi-2212 we explicitly show that the magnetic mode that dominates the self-energy at low temperatures directly evolves out of a smooth transfer of spectral weight to the mode from the continuum just above it. This redistribution starts already at 200 K in optimally doped materials but is much weaker in overdoped samples. This provides evidence for the magnetic origin of the superconductivity and presents a challenge to theories of the spin susceptibility and to neutron scattering experiments in high-temperature superconductors.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

96Pressure not reportedunknown
Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

82Pressure not reportedunknown
Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

60Pressure not reportedunknown
YBa2Cu3O6+δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

91Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers