Reading-out the state of a flux qubit by Josephson transmission line solitons
Arkady Fedorov, Alexander Shnirman, Gerd Schön, Anna Kidiyarova-Shevchenko
arXiv:cond-mat/0611680 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.75.224504 · 2006-11-27 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We describe the read-out process of the state of a Josephson flux qubit via solitons in Josephson transmission lines (JTL) as they are in use in the standard rapid single flux quantum (RSFQ) technology. We consider the situation where the information about the state of the qubit is stored in the time delay of the soliton. We analyze dissipative underdamped JTLs, take into account their jitter, and provide estimates of the measuring time and efficiency of the measurement for relevant experimental parameters.
Similar papers
Quantum transducers: Integrating Transmission Lines and Nanomechanical Resonators via Charge Qubits
similarity 0.92C. P. Sun et al. · 2005 · arXiv:quant-ph/0504056
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Reading out the state of a flux qubit by Josephson transmission line solitons
similarity 0.90Arkady Fedorov et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Optimal control for fast and high-fidelity quantum gates in coupled superconducting flux qubits
similarity 0.90Shang-Yu Huang & Hsi-Sheng Goan · 2014 · arXiv:1406.7707
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Time-resolved qubit readout via nonlinear Josephson inductance
similarity 0.90Georg M. Reuther et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1105.1105
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quantum dynamics of a single fluxon in Josephson junctions parallel arrays with large kinetic inductances
similarity 0.89S. S. Seidov & M. V. Fistul · 2021 · arXiv:2101.05693
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Time-optimal performance of Josephson charge qubits: A process tomography approach
similarity 0.89Robert Roloff & Walter Pötz · 2009 · arXiv:0906.3294
Source status unknown — claims are unverified