← Back to search

Specific Heat and Superfluid Density for Possible Two Different Superconducting States in NaxCoO2.yH2O

Masahito Mochizuki, H. Q. Yuan, Masao Ogata

arXiv:cond-mat/0612071 · DOI 10.1143/JPSJ.76.023702 · 2006-12-04 · Journal of the Physical Society of Japan

T2theoretical7 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

Several thermodynamic measurements for the cobaltate superconductor, NaxCoO2.yH2O, have so far provided results inconsistent with each other. In order to solve the discrepancies, we microscopically calculate the temperature dependences of specific heat and superfluid density for this superconductor. We show that two distinct specific-heat data from Oeschler et al. and Jin et al. are reproduced, respectively, for the extended s-wave state and the p-wave state. Two different superfluid-density data are also reproduced for each case. These support our recent proposal of possible two different pairing states in this material. In addition, we discuss the experimentally proposed large residual Sommerfeld coefficient and extremely huge effective carrier mass.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
NaxCoO2.yH2O

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

4.5Pressure not reportedunknown
NaxCoO2.yH2O

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

4.5Pressure not reportedunknown
NaxCoO2.yH2O

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

4.5Pressure not reportedunknown
NaxCoO2.yH2O

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

4.5Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers