No evidence for spontaneous orbital currents in finite size studies of three-band models for CuO planes
Martin Greiter, Ronny Thomale
arXiv:cond-mat/0701245 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.027005 · 2007-01-11 · Physical review letters
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We have numerically evaluated the current-current correlations for three-band models of the CuO planes in high-T_c superconductors at hole doping x=1/8. The results show no evidence for the orbital current patterns proposed by Varma. If such patterns exist, the associated energy is estimated to be smaller than 5 meV per link even if epsilon_p-epsilon_d=0. Assuming that the three-band models are adequate, quantum critical fluctuations of such patterns hence cannot be responsible for phenomena occurring at significantly higher energies, such as superconductivity or the anomalous properties of the pseudogap phase.
Similar papers
No Evidence for Spontaneous Orbital Currents in Numerical Studies of Three-Band Models for the CuO Planes of High Temperature Superconductors
similarity 0.95Martin Greiter & Ronny Thomale
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Numerical analysis of three-band models for CuO planes as candidates for a spontaneous T violating orbital current phase
similarity 0.90Ronny Thomale & Martin Greiter · 2007 · arXiv:0712.0942
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity in bilayer - Hubbard models
similarity 0.88Akito Iwano & Youhei Yamaji · 2022 · arXiv:2207.04205
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electronic properties of the mean-field resonating valence bond model of cuprates
similarity 0.88Sergei Urazhdin & Sergei Ivanov · 2022 · arXiv:2206.01063
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Phase diagram and single-particle spectrum of CuO layers within a variational cluster approach to the 3-band Hubbard model
similarity 0.88E. Arrigoni et al. · 2009 · arXiv:0902.0535
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Unconventional Superconductivity
similarity 0.88M. R. Norman · 2013 · arXiv:1302.3176
Source status unknown — claims are unverified