Critical relations in symmetric $0-π$ Josephson junctions
J. A. Angelova, T. L. Boyadjiev
arXiv:cond-mat/0702418 · 2007-02-18 · arXiv: Superconductivity
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Numerical modeling of dependences ``critical current -- external magnetic field'' for geometrically symmetric $0-π$ Josephson junctions is performed. The calculation of critical current is reduced to non-linear eigenvalue problem. The critical curve of the contact is obtained as an envelope of the bifurcation curves of different distributions of the magnetic flux. The structure of vortices in contact is observed explicitly and the dependence of the basic physical characteristics of these vortices on junction's length is explored. The comparison of numerical results and known experimental data shows good qualitative and quantitative conformity.
Similar papers
Static vortices in long Josephson junctions of exponentially varying width
similarity 0.91E. G. Semerdzhieva et al. · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0410085
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Created-by-current states in long Josephson junctions
similarity 0.90T. L. Boyadjiev et al. · 2007 · arXiv:0707.4043
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Vortex structure in exponentially shaped Josephson junctions
similarity 0.89Yu. M. Shukrinov et al. · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0410048
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Coordinate transformation in the model of long Josephson junctions: geometrically equivalent Josephson junctions
similarity 0.89E. G. Semerdzhieva et al. · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0603439
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Critical Current Calculations For Long - Josephson Junctions
similarity 0.89Ivan Tornes & David Stroud · 2007 · arXiv:0711.0136
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Josephson junction with magnetic-field tunable current-phase relation
similarity 0.88A. Lipman et al. · 2012 · arXiv:1208.4057
Source status unknown — claims are unverified