Superconductivity and Localization
M. V. Sadovskii
arXiv:cond-mat/9308018 · 1993-08-12
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We present a review of theoretical and experimental works on the problem of mutual interplay of Anderson localization and superconductivity in strongly disordered systems. We start with brief discussion of modern aspects of localization theory including the basic concept of scaling, self-consistent theory and interaction effects. After that we analyze disorder effects on Cooper pairing and superconducting transition temperature as well as Ginzburg-Landau equations for superconductors which are close to the Anderson transition. A necessary generalization of usual theory of ``dirty'' superconductors is formulated which allows to analyze anomalies of the main superconducting properties close to disorder-induced metal-insulator transition. Under very rigid conditions superconductivity may persist even in the localized phase (Anderson insulator).Strong disordering leads to considerable reduction of superconducting transition temperature T_{c} and to important anomalies in the behavior of the upper critical field H_{c2}. Fluctuation effects are also discussed. In the vicinity of Anderson transition inhomogeneous superconductivity appears due to statistical fluctuations of the local density of states. We briefly discuss a number of experiments demonstrating superconductivity close to the Anderson transition both in traditional and high-T_{c} superconductors. In traditional systems superconductivity is in most cases destroyed before metal-insulator transition. In case of high-T_{c} superconductors a number of anomalies show that superconductivity is apparently conserved in localized phase before it is suppressed by strong enough disorder.
Similar papers
Recombination of localized quasiparticles in disordered superconductors
similarity 0.92Steven A. H. de Rooij et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2410.18802
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Limits of the upper critical field in dirty two-gap superconductors
similarity 0.91A. Gurevich · 2007 · arXiv:cond-mat/0701281
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Temperature and Angular Dependence of the Upper Critical Field in KCrAs
similarity 0.90Huakun Zuo et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1511.06169
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Enhancement of the upper critical field by nonmagnetic impurities in dirty two-gap superconductors
similarity 0.90A. Gurevich · 2002 · arXiv:cond-mat/0212129
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Temperature dependence of the upper critical field of type-II superconductors from isothermal magnetization data. Application to high temperature superconductors
similarity 0.90I. L. Landau & H. R. Ott · 2002 · arXiv:cond-mat/0206178
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Ginzburg - Landau expansion in strongly disordered attractive Anderson - Hubbard model
similarity 0.90E. Z. Kuchinskii et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1702.05247
Source status unknown — claims are unverified