Magnetic and pair correlations of the Hubbard model with next-nearest-neighbor hopping
Alain F. Veilleux, Anne-Marie Daré, Liang Chen, Y. M. Vilk, A. -M. S. Tremblay
arXiv:cond-mat/9507045 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.52.16255 · 1995-07-14 · Physical review. B, Condensed matter
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
A combination of analytical approaches and quantum Monte Carlo simulations is used to study both magnetic and pairing correlations for a version of the Hubbard model that includes second-neighbor hopping $t^{\prime }=-0.35t$ as a model for high-temperature superconductors. Magnetic properties are analyzed using the Two-Particle Self-Consistent approach. The maximum in magnetic susceptibility as a function of doping appears both at finite $% t^{\prime }$ and at $t^{\prime }=0$ but for two totally different physical reasons. When $t^{\prime }=0$, it is induced by antiferromagnetic correlations while at $t^{\prime }=-0.35t$ it is a band structure effect amplified by interactions. Finally, pairing fluctuations are compared with $% T $-matrix results to disentangle the effects of van Hove singularity and of nesting on superconducting correlations. The addition of antiferromagnetic fluctuations increases slightly the $d$-wave superconducting correlations despite the presence of a van Hove singularity which tends to decrease them in the repulsive model. Some aspects of the phase diagram and some subtleties of finite-size scaling in Monte Carlo simulations, such as inverted finite-size dependence, are also discussed.
Similar papers
Superconductivity in the two-dimensional Hubbard model based on the exact pair potential
similarity 0.91André LeClair · 2010 · arXiv:1008.5116
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
CDMFT+HFD : an extension of dynamical mean field theory for nonlocal interactions applied to the single band extended Hubbard model
similarity 0.91Sarbajaya Kundu & David Sénéchal · 2023 · arXiv:2310.16075
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Pairing Tendencies in a Two-orbital Hubbard Model in One Dimension
similarity 0.91N. D. Patel et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1705.08780
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Photoinduced pseudospin-wave emission from charge-density-wave domain wall with superconductivity
similarity 0.91Yukihiro Matsubayashi et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2301.12049
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Pseudogap and high-temperature superconductivity from weak to strong coupling. Towards quantitative theory
similarity 0.90A. -M. S. Tremblay et al. · 2005 · arXiv:cond-mat/0511334
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Unfrustrating the t-J Model: d-wave BCS Superconductivity in the -- Model
similarity 0.90Kevin Slagle · 2019 · arXiv:1906.06344
Source status unknown — claims are unverified