← Back to search

Thermal Conductivity of Superconducting UPt$_3$ at Low Temperatures

M. J. Graf, S. -K. Yip, J. A. Sauls

arXiv:cond-mat/9512054 · DOI 10.1007/BF00755120 · 1995-12-07 · Journal of Low Temperature Physics

T2theoretical25 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

We study the thermal conductivity within the E$_{1g}$ and E$_{2u}$ models for superconductivity in UPt$_3$ and compare the theoretical results for electronic heat transport with recently measured results reported by Lussier, Ellman and Taillefer. The existing data down to $T/T_c\approx 0.1$ provides convincing evidence for the presence of both line and point nodes in the gap, but the data can be accounted for either by an E$_{1g}$ or E$_{2u}$ order parameter. We discuss the features of the pairing symmetry, Fermi surface, and excitation spectrum that are reflected in the thermal conductivity at very low temperatures. Significant differences between the E$_{1g}$ and E$_{2u}$ models are predicted to develop at excitation energies below the bandwidth of the impurity-induced Andreev bound states. The zero-temperature limit of the $\bf \hat c$ axis thermal conductivity, $\lim_{T\to 0} κ_c/T$, is \underline{universal} for the E$_{2u}$ model, but non-universal for the E$_{1g}$ model. Thus, impurity concentration studies at very low temperatures should differentiate between the nodal structures of the E$_{2u}$ and E$_{1g}$ models.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
UPt3

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers