Disorder in two dimensional Josephson junctions
Baruch Horovitz, Anatoly Golub
arXiv:cond-mat/9701153 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.57.656.2 · 1997-01-21 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
An effective free energy of a two dimensional (i.e. large area) Josephson Junctions is derived, allowing for thermal fluctuations, for random magnetic fields and for external currents. We show by using replica symmetry breaking methods, that the junction has four distinct phases: disordered, Josephson ordered, a glass phase and a coexisting Josephson order with the glass phase. Near the coexistence to glass transition at s=1/2 the critical current is ~ (area)^{-s+1/2} where s is a measure of disorder. Our results may account for junction ordering at temperatures well below the critical temperature of the bulk in high T_c trilayer junctions.
Similar papers
Disordered Josephson Junctions of d-Wave Superconductors
similarity 0.90T. Lueck et al. · 2003 · arXiv:cond-mat/0310250
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
-biased Josephson tunnel junctions
similarity 0.90R. Monaco et al. · 2009 · arXiv:0912.1510
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Josephson effect between a two-band superconductor with the s++ or s+- pairing symmetry and a conventional s-wave superconductor
similarity 0.89Shi-Zeng Lin · 2012 · arXiv:1204.0538
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Josephson junctions in a local inhomogeneous magnetic field
similarity 0.89V. M. Krasnov · 2020 · arXiv:2002.01715
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Anomalous Josephson Hall effect in doped topological insulators with the nematic superconductivity
similarity 0.89R. S. Akzyanov & A. L. Rakhmanov · 2022 · arXiv:2204.06888
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spontaneous Flux and Magnetic Interference Patterns in 0-pi Josephson Junctions
similarity 0.89J. R. Kirtley et al. · 1997 · arXiv:cond-mat/9703067
Source status unknown — claims are unverified