Reply to the Comment on 'Quantum Phase Slips and Transport in Ultra-Thin Superconducting Wires'

Andrei D. Zaikin; Dmitrii S. Golubev; Anne van Otterlo; Gergely T. Zimányi

doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.1552

← Back to search

Reply to the Comment on 'Quantum Phase Slips and Transport in Ultra-Thin Superconducting Wires'

Andrei D. Zaikin, Dmitrii S. Golubev, Anne van Otterlo, Gergely T. Zimányi

arXiv:cond-mat/9703139 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.1552 · 1997-03-13 · Physical Review Letters

T3189 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

We reply to the recent Comment [cond-mat/9702231] by J.-M. Duan. Our point of view is markedly different on every issue raised. Much of the disagreement can be traced to a different preception of experimentally relevant length scales. i) We explain the difference between our formulation, which rests on a microscopic basis, and the phenomenological one of the author. ii) Our renormalization scheme is fundamentally right, as the "log(log)" interaction appears only in wires of astronomical lengths. iii) The tunneling barrier is profoundly reduced by the kinetic inductance. iv) We do make an appropriate comparison to the data on the thinnest available wires.