Josephson current through charge density waves
M. I. Visscher, B. Rejaei
arXiv:cond-mat/9707220 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.4461 · 1997-07-21 · Physical Review Letters
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The effect of the collective charge density wave (CDW) motion on the Josephson current in a superconductor/charge density wave/superconductor junction is studied theoretically. By deriving the kinetic equations for the coupled superconductor-CDW system, it is shown that below the critical current the CDW does not move. Biased above this value, the Josephson current oscillates as a function of the velocity of the sliding CDW and the collective mode acts as a non-linear shunting resistor parallel to the Josephson channel. The effects of impurity pinning are accounted for at a phenomenological level.
Similar papers
Josephson Current through Charge Density Waves
similarity 0.93M. I. Visscher & B. Rejaei
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Interference phenomena in Josephson junctions with ferromagnetic bilayers: Spin-triplet correlations and resonances
similarity 0.92Danilo Nikolić et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2206.05770
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Phase-shifted Andreev levels in an altermagnet Josephson junction
similarity 0.91C. W. J. Beenakker & T. Vakhtel · 2023 · arXiv:2306.16300
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Boundary conditions for quasiclassical equations in the theory of superconductivity
similarity 0.91C. J. Lambert et al. · 1996 · arXiv:cond-mat/9610185
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
DEC-QED: A flux-based 3D electrodynamic modeling approach to superconducting circuits and materials
similarity 0.91Dung N. Pham et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2212.12775
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Tunneling currents in ferromagnetic systems with multiple broken symmetries
similarity 0.91J. Linder et al. · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0609314
Source status unknown — claims are unverified