Comparison of different ladder models
E. Jeckelmann, D. J. Scalapino, S. R. White
arXiv:cond-mat/9805116 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.58.9492 · 1998-05-10 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Using density matrix renormalization group calculations, we compare results obtained for the t-J, one-band Hubbard and three-band Hubbard models of a two-leg CuO ladder. Spin and charge gaps, pair binding energies, and effective pair hoppings are calculated for a wide range of parameters. All three models have an insulating state at a filling corresponding to one hole per Cu site. For physically relevant parameters their spin gaps are similar in size but they exhibit quite different charge gaps. We find that the binding energy of a pair of doped holes is of the order of the undoped ladder spin gap for all three models. The main difference between the models is the size of the effective pair hopping, which is significantly larger in the three-band model with parameters appropriate for CuO materials than in the other two models.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| (SrCa)14Cu24O41 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Superconductivity in the three-leg Hubbard ladder: a Quantum Monte Carlo study
similarity 0.90Takashi Kimura et al. · 1996 · arXiv:cond-mat/9610200
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Doping asymmetry in the three-band Hamiltonian for cuprate ladders: failure of the standard model of superconductivity in cuprates
similarity 0.89Jeong-Pil Song et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2302.08356
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Stripes on a 6-Leg Hubbard Ladder
similarity 0.89Steven R. White & D. J. Scalapino · 2003 · arXiv:cond-mat/0306545
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Phase diagram of the three band half-filled Cu-O two-leg ladder
similarity 0.89S. Lee et al. · 2005 · arXiv:cond-mat/0503380
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Charge density correlations in t-J ladders investigated by the CORE method
similarity 0.89Sylvain Capponi & Didier Poilblanc · 2002 · arXiv:cond-mat/0208337
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Pairing properties of correlated three-leg ladders with strong interchain couplings near 1/3 filling
similarity 0.89Yushi Yamada et al. · 2026 · arXiv:2604.17812
Source status unknown — claims are unverified