Pinned Balseiro-Falicov Model of Tunneling and Photoemission in the Cuprates
R. S. Markiewicz, C. Kusko, V. Kidambi
arXiv:cond-mat/9807068 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.60.627 · 1998-07-04 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The smooth evolution of the tunneling gap of Bi_2Sr_2CaCu_2O_8 with doping from a pseudogap state in the underdoped cuprates to a superconducting state at optimal and overdoping, has been interpreted as evidence that the pseudogap must be due to precursor pairing. We suggest an alternative explanation, that the smoothness reflects a hidden SO(N) symmetry near the (pi,0) points of the Brillouin zone (with N = 3, 4, 5, or 6). Because of this symmetry, the pseudogap could actually be due to any of a number of nesting instabilities, including charge or spin density waves or more exotic phases. We present a detailed analysis of this competition for one particular model: the pinned Balseiro-Falicov model of competing charge density wave and (s-wave) superconductivity. We show that most of the anomalous features of both tunneling and photoemission follow naturally from the model, including the smooth crossover, the general shape of the pseudogap phase diagram, the shrinking Fermi surface of the pseudogap phase, and the asymmetry of the tunneling gap away from optimal doping. Below T_c, the sharp peak at Delta_1 and the dip seen in the tunneling and photoemission near 2Delta_1 cannot be described in detail by this model, but we suggest a simple generalization to account for inhomogeneity, which does provide an adequate description. We show that it should be possible, with a combination of photoemission and tunneling, to demonstrate the extent of pinning of the Fermi level to the Van Hove singularity. A preliminary analysis of the data suggests pinning in the underdoped, but not in the overdoped regime.
Similar papers
Pair Phase Fluctuations and the Pseudogap
similarity 0.90T. Eckl et al. · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0110377
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Tunneling and Photoemission in an SO(6) Superconductor
similarity 0.90R. S. Markiewicz et al. · 1998 · arXiv:cond-mat/9807067
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The pseudogap in high-temperature superconductors: an experimental survey
similarity 0.89T. Timusk & B. W. Statt · 1999 · arXiv:cond-mat/9905219
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
SO(6)-Generalized Pseudogap Model of the Cuprates
similarity 0.89R. S. Markiewicz et al. · 1999 · arXiv:cond-mat/9903421
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Two Pseudogaps in the Cuprates
similarity 0.89R. S. Markiewicz · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0108075
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Stripes, Pseudogaps, and Van Hove Nesting in the Three-band tJ Model
similarity 0.89R. S. Markiewicz · 1997 · arXiv:cond-mat/9701227
Source status unknown — claims are unverified