The Attractive Hubbard Model in 2D: Is it capable of describing a pseudogap and preformed pairs?
M. Letz
arXiv:cond-mat/9807383 · DOI 10.1023/A:1007769503006 · 1998-07-29 · Journal of Superconductivity
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Deviations from Fermi liquid behavior are well documented in the normal state of the cuprate superconductors, and some of these differences seem to be related to pre-transitional features appearing at temperatures above T$_c$. The observation of a pseudogap, e.g. in ARPES experiments, is a familiar example of this physics. One potential explanation for this behaviour involves preformed pairs with finite lifetimes existing in the normal state above T$_c$. In this way two characteristic temperatures can be established. A higher one T$^*$ at which pairs begin to form and the actual T$_c$ at which a phase-coherent superconducting phase is established. In order to test these ideas we have investigated the negative U Hubbard model in two dimensions in the fully self-consistent ladder approximation at low electron densities. In the non self-consistent version of this theory the system always shows an instability towards Bose-condensation of infinite lifetime pairs. In contrast to this, pairs obtain a finite lifetime due to pair-pair interaction and the sharp two-particle bound state is strongly lifetime broadened when self-consistency is applied. A quasi-particle scattering rate which varies linearly with temperature is also found. The fully self-consistent calculation we were able to perform using a ${\bf {\vec k}}$--averaged approximation in which the self-energy loses its ${\bf {\vec k}}$-dispersion due to a ${\bf {\vec k}}$-average. This approximation is found to preserve the essential physics.
Similar papers
Pair fluctuation induced pseudogap in the normal phase of the two-dimensional attractive Hubbard model at weak coupling
similarity 0.91Daniel Rohe & Walter Metzner · 2000 · arXiv:cond-mat/0011500
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Precursor Pairing Correlations and Pseudogaps
similarity 0.91Mohit Randeria · 1997 · arXiv:cond-mat/9710223
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity in the two-dimensional Hubbard model?
similarity 0.90D. Baeriswyl et al. · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0612690
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spectral Properties of the Attractive Hubbard Model
similarity 0.90M. Letz & R. J. Gooding · 1998 · arXiv:cond-mat/9802110
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Non-perturbative approach to the attractive Hubbard model
similarity 0.90S. Allen & A. -M. S. Tremblay · 2000 · arXiv:cond-mat/0010039
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
A self-consistent, conserving theory of the attractive Hubbard model in two dimensions
similarity 0.90M. Letz & R. J. Gooding · 1998 · arXiv:cond-mat/9802107
Source status unknown — claims are unverified