Conductances in normal and normal-superconductor structures
F. Sols, J. Sánchez-Cañizares
arXiv:cond-mat/9811325 · DOI 10.1006/spmi.1999.0713 · 1998-11-23 · Superlattices and Microstructures
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We study theoretically electronic transport through a normal metal-- superconductor (NS) interface and show that more than one conductance may be defined, depending on the pair of chemical potentials whose difference one chooses to relate linearly to the current. We argue that the situation is analogous to that found for purely normal transport, where different conductance formulae can be invoked. We revisit the problem of the "right" conductance formula in a simple language, and analyze its extension to the case of mesoscopic superconductivity. The well-known result that the standard conductance of a NS interface becomes 2 (in units of $2e^2/h$) in the transmissive limit, is viewed here in a different light. We show that it is not directly related to the presence of Andreev reflection, but rather to a particular choice of chemical potentials. This value of 2 is measurable because only one single-contact resistance is involved in a typical experimental setup, in contrast with the purely normal case, where two of them intervene. We introduce an alternative NS conductance that diverges in the transmissive limit due to the inability of Andreev reflection to generate a voltage drop. We illustrate numerically how different choices of chemical potential can yield widely differing I--V curves for a given NS interface.
Similar papers
Interplay between Majorana and Shiba states in a minimal Kitaev chain coupled to a superconductor
similarity 0.89Miguel Alvarado et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2407.07050
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Current-voltage characteristics of superconductor-normal metal-superconductor junctions
similarity 0.89T. Liu et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2212.05625
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Scattering matrix approach to the description of quantum electron transport
similarity 0.89G. B. Lesovik & I. A. Sadovskyy · 2014 · arXiv:1408.1966
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nonequilibrium regimes for quasiparticles in superconducting qubits with gap-asymmetric junctions
similarity 0.88G. Marchegiani & G. Catelani · 2024 · arXiv:2408.17218
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The influence of spin-dependent phases of tunneling electrons on the conductance of a point ferromagnet/isolator/superconductor contact
similarity 0.88B. P. Vodopyanov · 2008 · arXiv:0803.2499
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Normal metal to ferromagnetic superconductor tunneling
similarity 0.88Naoum Karchev & Tzanko Ivanov · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0401480
Source status unknown — claims are unverified