On the Coexistence in RuSr2GdCu2O8 of Superconductivity and Ferromagnetism
R. Weht, A. B. Shick, W. E. Pickett
arXiv:cond-mat/9903210 · DOI 10.1063/1.59586 · 1999-03-12
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We review the reasons that make superconductivity unlikely to arise in a ferromagnet. Then, in light of the report by Tallon and collaborators that RuSr2GdCu2O8 becomes superconducting at approximately 35 K which is well below the Curie temperature of 132 K, we consider whether the objections really apply to this compound. Our considerations are supported by local spin density calculations for this compound, which indeed indicate a ferromagnetic RuO2 layer. The Ru moment resides in t_2g orbitals but is characteristic of itinerant magnetism (and is sensitive to choice of exchange-correlation potential and to the atomic positions). Based on the small exchange splitting that is induced in the Cu-O layers, the system seems capable of supporting singlet superconductivity an FFLO-type order parameter and possibly a pi-phase alternation between layers. If instead the pairing is triplet in the RuO2 layers, it can be distinguished by a spin-polarized supercurrent. Either type of superconductivity seems to imply a spontaneous vortex phase if the magnetization is rotated out of the plane.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| RuSr2GdCu2O8-δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 35 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| RuSr2GdCu2O8-δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 35 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| RuSr2GdCu2O8-δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 35 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Direct Observation of Coexistence of Ferromagnetism and Superconductivity in RuSr2(Gd0.7Ce0.3)2Cu2O10
similarity 0.92S. Y. Chen et al. · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0105510
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Towards universal magnetization curves in the superconducting state of RuSr2GdCu2O8
similarity 0.92Thomas P. Papageorgiou et al. · 2003 · arXiv:cond-mat/0304263
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Point-contact study of gap amplitude and symmetry in RuSr_2GdCu_2O_8
similarity 0.92G. A. Ummarino et al. · 2003 · arXiv:cond-mat/0309553
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
A Possible Crypto-Superconducting Structure in a Superconducting Ferromagnet
similarity 0.91C. W. Chu et al. · 2000 · arXiv:cond-mat/0002212
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity in Ferromagnetic RuSr2GdCu2O8
similarity 0.91W. E. Pickett et al. · 1999 · arXiv:cond-mat/9909175
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Crystal structures, magnetic and superconducting properties of the RuSr_2NdCu_2O_x and RuSr_2GdCu_2O_y compounds
similarity 0.91A. Vecchione et al. · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0110482
Source status unknown — claims are unverified