Giant vortex state in perforated aluminum microsquares
V. Bruyndoncx, J. G. Rodrigo, T. Puig, L. Van Look, V. V. Moshchalkov, R. Jonckheere
arXiv:cond-mat/9905093 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.60.4285 · 1999-05-07 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We investigate the nucleation of superconductivity in a uniform perpendicular magnetic field H in aluminum microsquares containing a few (2 and 4) submicron holes (antidots). The normal/superconducting phase boundary T_c(H) of these structures shows a quite different behavior in low and high fields. In the low magnetic field regime fluxoid quantization around each antidot leads to oscillations in T_c(H), expected from the specific sample geometry, and reminiscent of the network behavior. In high magnetic fields, the T_c(H) boundaries of the perforated and a reference non-perforated microsquare reveal cusps at the same values of Phi/Phi_0 (where Phi is the applied flux threading the total square area and Phi_0 is the superconducting flux quantum), while the background on T_c(H) becomes quasi-linear, indicating that a giant vortex state is established. The influence of the actual geometries on T_c(H) is analyzed in the framework of the linearized Ginzburg-Landau theory.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Al Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1.361 | Pressure not reported | midpoint |
| Al Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1.353 | Pressure not reported | midpoint |
| Al Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1.369 | Pressure not reported | midpoint |
Similar papers
Vortex-Antivortex Lattices in Superconducting Films with Magnetic Pinning Arrays
similarity 0.89M. V. Milosevic & F. M. Peeters · 2005 · arXiv:cond-mat/0504647
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nucleation of superconductivity in a mesoscopic loop of varying width
similarity 0.88M. Morelle et al. · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0408398
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Multivortex and giant vortex states near the expulsion and penetration fields in thin mesoscopic superconducting squares
similarity 0.88B. J. Baelus et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Vortex rectification effects in films with periodic asymmetric pinning
similarity 0.87J. Van de Vondel et al. · 2005 · arXiv:cond-mat/0501140
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Flux-Induced Vortex in Mesoscopic Superconducting Loops
similarity 0.87Jorge Berger & Jacob Rubinstein · 1997 · arXiv:cond-mat/9711043
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Saddle point states and energy barriers for vortex entrance and exit in superconducting disks and rings
similarity 0.87B. J. Baelus et al. · 2000 · arXiv:cond-mat/0010217
Source status unknown — claims are unverified