Phase diffusion and suppression of the supercurrent by quantum-mechanical fluctuations of the Josephson plasma
Kurt Gloos, Frithjof Anders
arXiv:cond-mat/9905294 · DOI 10.1023/A:1021874709355 · 1999-05-20 · Journal of Low Temperature Physics
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The RCSJ model of resistively and capacitively shunted Josephson junctions is used to describe superconducting point contacts over a wide range of resistances up to the metallic -- tunneling transition. Their small dynamic capacitance of order $C = 0.1 $fF due to the point-contact geometry results in a huge plasma frequency. The critical current is then strongly suppressed and the contact resistance becomes finite because of quantum-mechanical zero-point fluctuations of the Josephson plasma and the rather large escape rate out of the zero-voltage state due to quantum tunneling. We test the predictions of the RCSJ model on the classical superconductors lead, indium, aluminum, and cadmium.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
| In Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
| Al Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
| Cd Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
Similar papers
Axion field influence on Josephson junction quasipotential
similarity 0.89Roberto Grimaudo et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2307.15219
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Point-contact measurements of the energy gap of lead-chalcogenide-based superconducting superlattices
similarity 0.89I. K. Yanson et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1611.06533
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Half-integer Shapiro steps in highly transmissive InSb nanoflag Josephson junctions
similarity 0.89Andrea Iorio et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2303.05951
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Incomplete Andreev reflection in a clean Superconductor/Ferromagnet/Superconductor junction
similarity 0.88J. Cayssol & G. Montambaux · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0404215
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Supercurrent noise in SNS junctions
similarity 0.88D. V. Averin · 2000 · arXiv:cond-mat/0003315
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Andreev reflection from non-centrosymmetric superconductors and Majorana bound state generation in half-metallic ferromagnets
similarity 0.88Mathias Duckheim & Piet W. Brouwer · 2010 · arXiv:1011.5839
Source status unknown — claims are unverified