Quasiclassical theory of superconductivity: a multiple interface geometry(II)
A. Shelankov, M. Ozana
arXiv:cond-mat/9907230 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.61.7077 · 1999-07-15 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
A new method which allows one to study multiple coherent reflection/transmissions by partially transparent interfaces, (e.g., in multi-layer mesoscopic structures or grain boundaries in high-Tc's), in the framework of the quasiclassical theory of superconductivity is suggested. It is argued that in the presence of interfaces, a straight-line trajectory transforms to a simple connected 1-dimensional tree (graph) with knots, i.e. the points where the interface scattering events occur and pieces of the trajectories are coupled. For the 2-component trajectory "wave function" which factorizes the matrix Gor'kov Green's function, a linear boundary condition on the knot is formulated for an arbitrary interface, specular or diffusive (in the many channel model). From the new boundary condition, we derive: (i) the excitation scattering amplitude for the multi-channel Andreev/ordinary reflection/transmission processes; (ii) the boundary conditions for the Riccati equation; (iii) the transfer matrix which couples the trajectory Green's function before and after the interface scattering. To show the usage of the method, the cases of a film separated from a bulk superconductor by a partially transparent interface, and a SIS' sandwich with finite thickness layers, are considered. The electric current response to the vector potential (the superfluid density $ρ_s$) with the $π$ phase difference in S and S' is calculated for the sandwich. It is shown that the model is very sensitive to imperfection of the SS' interface: the low temperature response being paramagnetic ($ρ_s <0$) in the ideal system case, changes its sign and becomes diamagnetic ($ρ_s > 0$) when the probability of reflection is as low as a few percent.
Similar papers
Proximity effects in superconductor-ferromagnet heterostructures
similarity 0.91A. I. Buzdin · 2005 · arXiv:cond-mat/0505583
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effects of gap anisotropy upon the electronic structure around a superconducting vortex
similarity 0.91N. Hayashi et al. · 1997 · arXiv:cond-mat/9705286
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Free Energy of an Inhomogeneous Superconductor: a Wave Function Approach
similarity 0.89Ioan Kosztin et al. · 1998 · arXiv:cond-mat/9803317
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Elementary Andreev Processes in a Driven Superconductor-Normal Metal Contact
similarity 0.89Wolfgang Belzig & Mihajlo Vanevic · 2015 · arXiv:1508.07039
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Andreev Bound States and Their Signatures
similarity 0.89J. A. Sauls · 2018 · arXiv:1805.11069
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
A phenomenological theory of zero-energy Andreev resonant states
similarity 0.89Yasuhiro Asano et al. · 2003 · arXiv:cond-mat/0307345
Source status unknown — claims are unverified