Phase separation and stripe formation in the 2D t-J model: a comparison of numerical results
Steven R. White, D. J. Scalapino
arXiv:cond-mat/9907375 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.61.6320 · 1999-07-24 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We make a critical analysis of numerical results for and against phase separation and stripe formation in the t-J model. We argue that the frustrated phase separation mechanism for stripe formation requires phase separation at too high a doping for it to be consistent with existing numerical studies of the t-J model. We compare variational energies for various methods, and conclude that the most accurate calculations for large systems appear to be from the density matrix renormalization group. These calculations imply that the ground state of the doped t-J model is striped, not phase separated.
Similar papers
Numerical Results for the Hubbard Model: Implications for the High Tc Pairing Mechanism
similarity 0.91Douglas J. Scalapino & Steven R. White · 2000 · arXiv:cond-mat/0007515
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Why do stripes form in doped antiferromagnets and what is their relationship to superconductivity?
similarity 0.90Steven R. White & D. J. Scalapino · 2000 · arXiv:cond-mat/0006071
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Topological doping and the stability of stripe phases
similarity 0.90Leonid P. Pryadko et al. · 1999 · arXiv:cond-mat/9905146
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Stripes: Why hole rich lines are antiphase domain walls?
similarity 0.90Oron Zachar · 2000 · arXiv:cond-mat/0001217
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Pairing and Density Correlations of Stripe Electrons in a Two-Dimensional Antiferromagnet
similarity 0.90H. Johannesson & G. I. Japaridze · 2003 · arXiv:cond-mat/0301585
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Revisit Phase Separation of the Two-Dimensional model by the Power-Lanczos Method
similarity 0.89C. T. Shih et al. · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0104067
Source status unknown — claims are unverified