← Back to search

The role of domain walls on the vortex creep dynamics in unconventional superconducors

Manfred Sigrist, Daniel F. Agterberg

arXiv:cond-mat/9910526 · DOI 10.1143/PTP.102.965 · 1999-11-01 · Progress of Theoretical Physics

T4theoretical49 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

We investigate the influence of domain walls on the vortex dynamics in superconductors with multi-component order parameters. We show that, due to their complex structure domain walls can carry vortices with fractional flux quanta. The decay of conventional vortices into fractional ones on domain walls is examined. This decay presents an extraordinarily strong pinning mechanism for vortices and turns domain walls occupied with pinned fractional vortices into efficient barriers for the vortex motion. Therefore, domain walls can act as fences for the flux flow, preventing the decay of the remnant magnetic flux enclosed by them. Furthermore, the consequences of this property of domain walls on the vortex dynamics are discussed in connection with observed noise in the hysteresis cycle, using the Bean model of the critical vortex state. Based on this picture experimental data in the unconventional superconductors UPt$_3$, U$_{1-x}$Th$_x$Be$_{13}$ and Sr$_2$RuO$_4$ are interpreted.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
UPt3

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
U1-xThxBe13

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
Sr2RuO4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

0.05Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers