Nature of spin-charge separation
Z. Y. Weng, D. N. Sheng, C. S. Ting
arXiv:cond-mat/9911146 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.61.12328 · 1999-11-10 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Quasiparticle properties are explored in an effective theory of the $t-J$ model which includes two important components: spin-charge separation and unrenormalizable phase shift. We show that the phase shift effect indeed causes the system to be a non-Fermi liquid as conjectured by Anderson on a general ground. But this phase shift also drastically changes a conventional perception of quasiparticles in a spin-charge separation state: an injected hole will remain {\em stable} due to the confinement of spinon and holon by the phase shift field despite the background is a spinon-holon sea. True {\em deconfinement} only happens in the {\em zero-doping} limit where a bare hole will lose its integrity and decay into holon and spinon elementary excitations. The Fermi surface structure is completely different in these two cases, from a large band-structure-like one to four Fermi points in one-hole case, and we argue that the so-called underdoped regime actually corresponds to a situation in between, where the ``gap-like'' effect is amplified further by a microscopic phase separation at low temperature. Unique properties of the single-electron propagator in both normal and superconducting states are studied by using the equation of motion method. We also comment on some of influential ideas proposed in literature related to the Mott-Hubbard insulator and offer a unified view based on the present consistent theory.
Similar papers
Discontinuous Transition to Superconducting Phase
similarity 0.89Takumi Sato et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2308.02211
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Exact Thermodynamics of Pairing and Charge-spin Separation Crossovers in Small Hubbard Nanoclusters
similarity 0.89A. N. Kocharian et al. · 2007 · arXiv:cond-mat/0701022
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Colloquium: Spin-orbit effects in superconducting hybrid structures
similarity 0.89Morten Amundsen et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2210.03549
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The magnetic nature of superconductivity in doped cuprates
similarity 0.89Shiping Feng et al. · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0407310
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Solitonic ground states in (color-) superconductivity
similarity 0.88Nickel, Dominik & Buballa, Michael · 2010 · arXiv:0811.2400
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Non-universal pairing symmetry and pseudogap phenomena in hole- and electron-doped cuprate superconductors
similarity 0.88N. -C. Yeh & C. -T. Chen · 2003 · arXiv:cond-mat/0302217
Source status unknown — claims are unverified