Quantum dynamics of charged and neutral magnetic solitons: Spin-charge separation in the one-dimensional Hubbard model
Mona Berciu, Sajeev John
arXiv:cond-mat/9912460 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.61.10015 · 1999-12-27 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We demonstrate that the Configuration Interaction (CI) Approximation recaptures essential features of the exact (Bethe Ansatz) solution to the 1D Hubbard model. As such, it provides valuable route for describing effects which go beyond mean-field theory for strongly correlated electron systems in higher dimensions. The CI method systematically describes fluctuation and quantum tunneling corrections to the Hartree-Fock Approximation (HFA). HFA predicts that doping a half-filled Hubbard chain leads to the appearance of charged spin-polarons or charged domain-wall solitons in the antiferromagnetic (AFM) background. The CI method, on the other hand, describes the quantum dynamics of these charged magnetic solitons and quantum tunneling effects between various mean-field configurations. In this paper, we test the accuracy of the CI method against the exact solution of the one-dimensional Hubbard model. We find remarkable agreement between the energy of the mobile charged bosonic domain-wall (as given by the CI method) and the exact energy of the doping hole (as given by the Bethe Ansatz) for the entire $U/t$ range. The CI method also leads to a clear demonstration of the spin-charge separation in 1D. Addition of one doping hole to the half-filled antiferromagnetic chain results in the appearance of two different carriers: a charged bosonic domain-wall (which carries the charge but no spin) and a neutral spin-1/2 domain wall (which carries the spin but no charge).
Similar papers
Deformation of a Néel-type Skyrmion in a Weak Inhomogeneous Magnetic Field: Magnetization Ansatz and Interaction with a Pearl Vortex
similarity 0.91S. S. Apostoloff et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2311.05578
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Hall coefficient and magnetoresistance in boson+fermion dimer models for the pseudogap phase of high Tc superconductors
similarity 0.90Garry Goldstein · 2018 · arXiv:1804.00330
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Variational Monte Carlo method for fermionic models combined with tensor networks and applications to the hole-doped two-dimensional Hubbard model
similarity 0.90Hui-Hai Zhao et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1703.03537
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Breakdown of the coexistence of spin-singlet superconductivity and itinerant ferromagnetism
similarity 0.89R. Shen et al. · 2002 · arXiv:cond-mat/0206418
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
A numerical study of multi-soliton configurations in a doped antiferromagnetic Mott insulator
similarity 0.89Mona Berciu & Sajeev John · 1998 · arXiv:cond-mat/9805229
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nuclear Spin-Lattice Relaxation Rate in Odd-Frequency Superconductivity
similarity 0.89Shumpei Iwasaki & Yoji Ohashi · 2024 · arXiv:2409.10894
Source status unknown — claims are unverified