Macroscopic tunnel splittings in superconducting phase qubits
Philip R. Johnson, William T. Parsons, Frederick W. Strauch, J. R. Anderson, Alex J. Dragt, C. J. Lobb, F. C. Wellstood
arXiv:quant-ph/0411181 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.187004 · 2004-11-24 · Physical review letters
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Prototype Josephson-junction based qubit coherence times are too short for quantum computing. Recent experiments probing superconducting phase qubits have revealed previously unseen fine splittings in the transition energy spectra. These splittings have been attributed to new microscopic degrees of freedom (microresonators), a previously unknown source of decoherence. We show that macroscopic resonant tunneling in the extremely asymmetric double well potential of the phase qubit can have observational consequences that are strikingly similar to the observed data.
Similar papers
Macroscopic Tunnel Splittings in Superconducting Phase Qubits
similarity 0.92Philip R. Johnson et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Tunneling of fluxons via a Josephson resonant level
similarity 0.88T. Vakhtel et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2310.03102
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Single-Shot Readout of Macroscopic Quantum Superposition State in a Superconducting Flux Qubit
similarity 0.87Hirotaka Tanaka et al. · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0407299
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Dynamics of Josephson junctions beyond the tunneling limit
similarity 0.87Jacob F. Steiner et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2511.03811
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Observation of quantum oscillations between a Josephson phase qubit and a microscopic resonator using fast readout
similarity 0.87K. B. Cooper et al. · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0405710
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting Qubit Storage and Entanglement with Nanomechanical Resonators
similarity 0.87Andrew N. Cleland & Michael R. Geller · 2003 · arXiv:cond-mat/0311007
Source status unknown — claims are unverified