Protocol for universal gates in optimally biased superconducting qubits
Chad Rigetti, Michel Devoret
arXiv:quant-ph/0412009 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.240502 · 2004-12-01 · Physical Review Letters
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We present a new experimental protocol for performing universal gates in a register of superconducting qubits coupled by fixed on-chip linear reactances. The qubits have fixed, detuned Larmor frequencies and can remain, during the entire gate operation, biased at their optimal working point where decoherence due to fluctuations in control parameters is suppressed to first order. Two-qubit gates are performed by simultaneously irradiating two qubits at their respective Larmor frequencies with appropriate amplitude and phase, while one-qubit gates are performed by the usual single-qubit irradiation pulses.
Similar papers
Protocol for Universal Gates in Optimally Biased Superconducting Qubits
similarity 0.93Chad Rigetti et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Entanglement of superconducting qubits via microwave fields: classical and quantum regimes
similarity 0.90Jian Li et al. · 2008 · arXiv:0803.0397
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Generation of Three-Qubit Entangled States using Superconducting Phase Qubits
similarity 0.89M. Neeley et al. · 2010 · arXiv:1004.4246
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quantum theory of the low-frequency linear susceptibility of interferometer-type superconducting qubits
similarity 0.88Ya. S. Greenberg & E. Il'ichev · 2007 · arXiv:0709.2459
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Using Sideband Transitions for Two-Qubit Operations in Superconducting Circuits
similarity 0.88P. J. Leek et al. · 2008 · arXiv:0812.2678
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting Circuit Architecture for Digital-Analog Quantum Computing
similarity 0.88J. Yu et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2103.15696
Source status unknown — claims are unverified