Ab initio superfluid weight and superconducting penetration depth
Kaja H. Hiorth, Martin Gutierrez-Amigo, Théo Cavignac, Kristjan Haule, Miguel A. L. Marques, Päivi Törmä
DOI 10.1103/2xrg-6fy6 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Machine learning and high-throughput screening approaches to superconductor discovery require physically meaningful descriptors that capture essential physics while remaining computationally tractable. The superfluid weight is an ideal descriptor as it is a prerequisite for superconductivity, determines the magnetic penetration depth and the Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless transition temperature in two-dimensional materials, may limit the critical temperature in unconventional superconductors through phase coherence, and reveals quantum geometric contributions to supercurrent transport. We develop a computationally efficient framework for calculating the zero-temperature, mean-field superfluid weight for uniform pairing from density functional theory band structures and Bloch wave functions. We separately evaluate the conventional contribution from band curvature and the geometric contribution from quantum geometry. To validate the method, we calculate London penetration depths for a few conventional superconductors (Al, Pb, Nb, MgB2, LuRu3B2, and YRu3B2) and find good agreement with experiment after accounting for nonlocal corrections, strong-coupling effects, and sample quality. The conventional contribution dominates by orders of magnitude in these wideband materials, as expected. This framework provides a foundation for large-scale screening of superconducting candidates and exploring quantum geometric effects in unconventional superconductors.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Al Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Pb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| MgB2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| LuRu3B2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| YRu3B2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Ab initio theory of superconductivity. II. Application to elemental metals
similarity 0.94M. A. L. Marques et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effects of incomplete superconducting condensation in S-wave superconductors
similarity 0.94Ju. H. Kim
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting wires and fractional flux
similarity 0.94C. A. R. Sá de Melo
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Influence of the boundary conditions on the current flow pattern along a superconducting wire
similarity 0.93Jorge Berger
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Penetration-depth anisotropy in two-band superconductors
similarity 0.93V. G. Kogan & N. V. Zhelezina
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity in electron liquids with and without intermediaries
similarity 0.93C. F. Richardson & N. W. Ashcroft
Source status unknown — claims are unverified