Fingerprints of Preformed Pairs in Two-Electron Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy
Janez Bonča, Andrea Damascelli, Mona Berciu
DOI 10.1103/4c3d-1bm7 · Physical Review Letters
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We use variational exact diagonalization (VED) to calculate the two-electron removal spectral weight for the Hubbard-Holstein model, starting from the ground state with two electrons on a one-dimensional chain. We argue that this spectral weight provides a valuable proxy for the intensity of 2eARPES processes. Our results show that when contrasted to the presumably larger signal due to two electrons ejected from two different pairs, the presumably weaker signal due to two electrons ejected from the same pair (i) is segregated in energy, appearing at a lower binding energy, and (ii) has a very characteristic momentum dependence, with a different symmetry than that of the signal corresponding to two electrons emitted from two different pairs. We verify that these fingerprints appear for pairs with different symmetries, and prove that they arise as a direct consequence of momentum and energy conservation, therefore they are generic for any model with electron-boson coupling that can lead to formation of electron pairs. Experimental observation of these fingerprints will confirm the existence of pairs. Moreover, the momentum dependence map allows one to distinguish whether the pairs are coherent (superconducting) or not. Finally, we argue that these considerations generalize to finite but low electron concentrations, finite temperatures, and higher dimensions.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hubbard-Holstein Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Distinguishing finite momentum superconducting pairing states with two-electron photoemission spectroscopy
similarity 0.85Fahad Mahmood et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2108.04260
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
d-wave superconductivity in Hubbard model on the square lattice perturbed by weak 3D uniaxial anisotropy
similarity 0.85J. M. P. Carmelo · 2008 · arXiv:0804.2388
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quantitative Determination of the Pairing Interactions for High Temperature Superconductivity in Cuprates
similarity 0.85Jin Mo Bok et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1601.02493
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Two-terminal transport along a proximity-induced superconducting quantum Hall edge
similarity 0.84Oleksandr Gamayun et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Importance of the Electron-Phonon Interaction with the Forward Scattering Peak for Superconducting Pairing in Cuprates
similarity 0.84Miodrag L. Kulic · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0606063
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Measuring the Debye Energy in Superconductors via two Electron Photoemission Spectroscopy
similarity 0.84Ka Ho Wong et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2404.15994
Source status unknown — claims are unverified