← Back to search

Fingerprints of Preformed Pairs in Two-Electron Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy

Janez Bonča, Andrea Damascelli, Mona Berciu

DOI 10.1103/4c3d-1bm7 · Physical Review Letters

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

We use variational exact diagonalization (VED) to calculate the two-electron removal spectral weight for the Hubbard-Holstein model, starting from the ground state with two electrons on a one-dimensional chain. We argue that this spectral weight provides a valuable proxy for the intensity of 2eARPES processes. Our results show that when contrasted to the presumably larger signal due to two electrons ejected from two different pairs, the presumably weaker signal due to two electrons ejected from the same pair (i) is segregated in energy, appearing at a lower binding energy, and (ii) has a very characteristic momentum dependence, with a different symmetry than that of the signal corresponding to two electrons emitted from two different pairs. We verify that these fingerprints appear for pairs with different symmetries, and prove that they arise as a direct consequence of momentum and energy conservation, therefore they are generic for any model with electron-boson coupling that can lead to formation of electron pairs. Experimental observation of these fingerprints will confirm the existence of pairs. Moreover, the momentum dependence map allows one to distinguish whether the pairs are coherent (superconducting) or not. Finally, we argue that these considerations generalize to finite but low electron concentrations, finite temperatures, and higher dimensions.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
Hubbard-Holstein

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers