Single Flux Quantum-Based Digital Control of Superconducting Qubits in a Multichip Module
C.H. Liu, A. Ballard, D. Olaya, D.R. Schmidt, J. Biesecker, T. Lucas, J. Ullom, S. Patel, O. Rafferty, A. Opremcak, K. Dodge, V. Iaia, T. McBroom, J.L. DuBois, P.F. Hopkins, S.P. Benz, B.L.T. Plourde, R. McDermott
DOI 10.1103/PRXQuantum.4.030310 · PRX Quantum
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Single flux quantum (SFQ) digital logic has been proposed for the scalable control of next-generation superconducting-qubit arrays. In the initial implementation, SFQ-based gate fidelity was limited by quasiparticle (QP) poisoning induced by the dissipative on-chip SFQ driver circuit. In this work, we introduce a multichip-module architecture to suppress phonon-mediated QP poisoning. Here, the SFQ elements and qubits are fabricated on separate chips that are joined with In-bump bonds. We use interleaved randomized benchmarking to characterize the fidelity of SFQ-based gates and we demonstrate an error per Clifford gate of 1.2(1)%, an order-of-magnitude reduction over the gate error achieved in the initial realization of SFQ-based qubit control. We use purity benchmarking to quantify the contribution of incoherent error at 0.96(2)%; we attribute this error to photon-mediated QP poisoning mediated by the resonant millimeter-wave antenna modes of the qubit and SFQ-qubit coupler. We anticipate that a straightforward redesign of the SFQ driver circuit to limit the bandwidth of the SFQ pulses will eliminate this source of infidelity, allowing SFQ-based gates with error approaching approximate known theoretical limits, of order 0.1% for resonant sequences and 0.01% for more complex pulse sequences involving variable pulse-to-pulse separation.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| In Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Sign- and Magnitude-Tunable Coupler for Superconducting Flux Qubits
similarity 0.96R. Harris et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Rapid on-demand generation of thermal states in superconducting quantum circuits
similarity 0.96Timm Mörstedt et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Hardware-Efficient Leakage-Reduction Scheme for Quantum Error Correction with Superconducting Transmon Qubits
similarity 0.96F. Battistel et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Millimeter-Wave Superconducting Qubit
similarity 0.95Alexander Anferov et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting Switch for Fast On-Chip Routing of Quantum Microwave Fields
similarity 0.95M. Pechal et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Single Flux Quantum-Based Digital Control of Superconducting Qubits in a Multi-Chip Module
similarity 0.94Chuan-Hong Liu et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2301.05696
Source status unknown — claims are unverified