Niobium superconducting rf cavity fabrication by electrohydraulic forming
E. Cantergiani, S. Atieh, F. Léaux, A. T. Perez Fontenla, S. Prunet, L. Dufay-Chanat, T. Koettig, F. Bertinelli, O. Capatina, G. Favre, F. Gerigk, A. C. Jeanson, J. Fuzeau, G. Avrillaud, D. Alleman, J. Bonafe, P. Marty
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.19.114703 · Physical Review Accelerators and Beams
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Superconducting rf (SRF) cavities are traditionally fabricated from superconducting material sheets or made of copper coated with superconducting material, followed by trim machining and electron-beam welding. An alternative technique to traditional shaping methods, such as deep-drawing and spinning, is electrohydraulic forming (EHF). In EHF, half-cells are obtained through ultrahigh-speed deformation of blank sheets, using shockwaves induced in water by a pulsed electrical discharge. With respect to traditional methods, such a highly dynamic process can yield interesting results in terms of effectiveness, repeatability, final shape precision, higher formability, and reduced springback. In this paper, the first results of EHF on high purity niobium are presented and discussed. The simulations performed in order to master the multiphysics phenomena of EHF and to adjust its process parameters are presented. The microstructures of niobium half-cells produced by EHF and by spinning have been compared in terms of damage created in the material during the forming operation. The damage was assessed through hardness measurements, residual resistivity ratio (RRR) measurements, and electron backscattered diffraction analyses. It was found that EHF does not worsen the damage of the material during forming and instead, some areas of the half-cell have shown lower damage compared to spinning. Moreover, EHF is particularly advantageous to reduce the forming time, preserve roughness, and to meet the final required shape accuracy.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Characterization of etch pits found on a large-grain bulk niobium superconducting radio-frequency resonant cavity
similarity 0.94Xin Zhao et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Local-limit disorder characteristics of niobium-based superconducting radio-frequency cavities
similarity 0.93Anastasiya Lebedeva et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Surface characterization of Nb samples electropolished with real superconducting rf accelerator cavities
similarity 0.93Xin Zhao et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Influence of crystalline structure on rf dissipation in superconducting niobium
similarity 0.93C. Z. Antoine
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Topographic evolution of heat-treated Nb upon electropolishing for superconducting rf applications
similarity 0.93Eric M. Lechner et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Impact of geometry on the magnetic flux trapping of superconducting accelerating cavities
similarity 0.93D. Longuevergne & A. Miyazaki
Source status unknown — claims are unverified