Pulsed Reset Protocol for Fixed-Frequency Superconducting Qubits
D.J. Egger, M. Werninghaus, M. Ganzhorn, G. Salis, A. Fuhrer, P. Müller, S. Filipp
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.10.044030 · Physical Review Applied
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Increasing coherence times of quantum bits is a fundamental challenge in the field of quantum computing. With long-lived qubits it is, however, inefficient to wait until the qubits have relaxed to their ground state after completion of an experiment. Moreover, for error-correction schemes it is important to rapidly reinitialize syndrome qubits. We present a simple pulsed qubit reset protocol based on a two-pulse sequence. A first pulse transfers the excited-state population to a higher excited qubit state and a second pulse transfer it into a lossy environment provided by a low-Q transmission-line resonator, which is also used for qubit read-out. We show that the remaining excited-state population can be suppressed to (1.7±0.1)% and that this figure may be reduced by further improving the pulse calibration.
Similar papers
Multipurpose architecture for fast reset and protective readout of superconducting qubits
similarity 0.91Jiayu Ding et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Dissipation-induced continuous quantum error correction for superconducting circuits
similarity 0.89Joachim Cohen & Mazyar Mirrahimi
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Model-Based Optimization of Superconducting Qubit Readout
similarity 0.89Andreas Bengtsson et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Stabilizer Quantum Error Correction Toolbox for Superconducting Qubits
similarity 0.88Simon E. Nigg & S. M. Girvin
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Persistent Control of a Superconducting Qubit by Stroboscopic Measurement Feedback
similarity 0.88P. Campagne-Ibarcq et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Entanglement and Quantum Error Correction with Superconducting Qubits
similarity 0.88Matthew Reed · 2013 · arXiv:1311.6759
Source status unknown — claims are unverified