Sputtered Mo66Re34 SQUID-on-Tip for High-Field Magnetic and Thermal Nanoimaging
Kousik Bagani, Jayanta Sarkar, Aviram Uri, Michael L. Rappaport, Martin E. Huber, Eli Zeldov, Yuri Myasoedov
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.12.044062 · Physical Review Applied
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Scanning nanoscale superconducting quantum interference devices (SQUIDs) are gaining interest as highly sensitive microscopic magnetic and thermal characterization tools of quantum and topological states of matter and devices. We introduce a technique of collimated differential-pressure magnetron sputtering for versatile self-aligned fabrication of SQUID-on-tip (SOT) nanodevices, which cannot be produced by conventional sputtering methods due to their diffusive, rather than the required directional point source, deposition. The technique provides access to a broad range of superconducting materials and alloys beyond the elemental superconductors employed in the existing thermal deposition methods, opening the route to greatly enhanced SOT characteristics and functionalities. Utilizing this method, we have developed molybdenum-rhenium (Mo66Re34) SOT devices with sub-50-nm diameter, magnetic flux sensitivity of 1.2 μΦ0/Hz1/2 up to 3 T at 4.2 K, and thermal sensitivity better than 4 μK/Hz1/2 up to 5 T—about five times higher than any previous report—paving the way to nanoscale imaging of magnetic and spintronic phenomena and of dissipation mechanisms in previously inaccessible quantum states of matter.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mo66Re34 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Al Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Pb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| In Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Sputtered MoRe SQUID-on-tip for high-field magnetic and thermal nanoimaging
similarity 0.91Kousik Bagani et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1908.09305
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Scanning nano-SQUID with single electron spin sensitivity
similarity 0.89Denis Vasyukov et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1308.0694
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetic, Thermal, and Topographic Imaging with a Nanometer-Scale SQUID-On-Lever Scanning Probe
similarity 0.89M. Wyss et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electrically tunable multi-terminal SQUID-on-tip
similarity 0.89Uri, Aviram et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1606.05088
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
SQUID-on-tip with single-electron spin sensitivity for high-field and ultra-low temperature nanomagnetic imaging
similarity 0.89Y. Anahory et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2001.03342
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Advanced SQUID-on-lever scanning probe for high-sensitivity magnetic microscopy with sub-100-nm spatial resolution
similarity 0.88Timur Weber et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified