Mitigation of Quasiparticle Loss in Superconducting Qubits by Phonon Scattering
Arno Bargerbos, Lukas Johannes Splitthoff, Marta Pita-Vidal, Jaap J. Wesdorp, Yu Liu, Peter Krogstrup, Leo P. Kouwenhoven, Christian Kraglund Andersen, Lukas Grünhaupt
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.19.024014 · Physical Review Applied
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Quantum error correction will be an essential ingredient in realizing fault-tolerant quantum computing. However, most correction schemes rely on the assumption that errors are sufficiently uncorrelated in space and time. In superconducting qubits, this assumption is drastically violated in the presence of ionizing radiation, which creates bursts of high-energy phonons in the substrate. These phonons can break Cooper pairs in the superconductor and, thus, create quasiparticles over large areas, consequently reducing qubit coherence across the quantum device in a correlated fashion. A potential mitigation technique is to place large volumes of normal or superconducting metal on the device, capable of reducing the phonon energy to below the superconducting gap of the qubits. To investigate the effectiveness of this method, we fabricate a quantum device with four nominally identical nanowire-based transmon qubits. On the device, half of the niobium-titanium-nitride ground plane is replaced with aluminum (Al), which has a significantly lower superconducting gap. We deterministically inject high-energy phonons into the substrate by voltage biasing a galvanically isolated Josephson junction. In the presence of the small-gap material, we find a factor of 2–5 less degradation in the injection-dependent qubit lifetimes and observe that the undesired excited qubit state population is mitigated by a similar factor. We furthermore turn the Al normal with a magnetic field, finding no change in the phonon protection. This suggests that the efficacy of the protection in our device is not limited by the size of the superconducting gap in the Al ground plane. Our results provide a promising foundation for protecting superconducting-qubit processors against correlated errors from ionizing radiation.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Al Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| NbTiN Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| InAs Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Suppressing charge noise decoherence in superconducting charge qubits
similarity 0.96J. A. Schreier et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quasiparticles in Superconducting Qubits with Asymmetric Junctions
similarity 0.96Giampiero Marchegiani et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Disentangling the impact of quasiparticles and two-level systems on the statistics of superconducting-qubit lifetime
similarity 0.95Shaojiang Zhu et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Coupling a Superconducting Quantum Circuit to a Phononic Crystal Defect Cavity
similarity 0.95Patricio Arrangoiz-Arriola et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Interacting defects generate stochastic fluctuations in superconducting qubits
similarity 0.95J. H. Béjanin et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Coherent control of a superconducting qubit with dynamically tunable qubit-cavity coupling
similarity 0.95A. J. Hoffman et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified