Disentangling the impact of quasiparticles and two-level systems on the statistics of superconducting-qubit lifetime
Shaojiang Zhu, Xinyuan You, Ugur Alyanak, Mustafa Bal, Francesco Crisa, Sabrina Garattoni, Andrei Lunin, Roman Pilipenko, Akshay Murthy, Alexander Romanenko, Anna Grassellino
DOI 10.1103/x4ny-17lk · Physical Review Applied
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Temporal fluctuations in the superconducting qubit lifetime, T1, present additional challenges in the pursuit of fault-tolerant quantum computing. Although the exact mechanisms remain unclear, T1 fluctuations are generally attributed to strong coupling between the qubit and a few near-resonant two-level systems (TLSs), which can exchange energy with an ensemble of thermally fluctuating two-level fluctuators (TLFs) at low frequencies. Here, we report T1 measurements of qubits with varying geometrical footprints and surface dielectrics as a function of temperature. By analyzing the noise spectrum of the qubit depolarization rate, Γ1=1/T1, we disentangle the contributions of TLSs, nonequilibrium quasiparticles (QPs), and equilibrium (thermally excited) QPs to the variance in Γ1. We find that the Γ1 variance in qubits with smaller footprints is more susceptible to QP and TLS fluctuations than that in larger-footprint qubits. Furthermore, the QP-induced variances in all qubits align with the theoretical framework of QP diffusion and fluctuation. These findings offer valuable insights for future qubit design and engineering optimization.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Al Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Quasiparticles in Superconducting Qubits with Asymmetric Junctions
similarity 0.96Giampiero Marchegiani et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Interacting defects generate stochastic fluctuations in superconducting qubits
similarity 0.96J. H. Béjanin et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Tunable Superconducting Qubits with Flux-Independent Coherence
similarity 0.95M. D. Hutchings et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Mitigation of Quasiparticle Loss in Superconducting Qubits by Phonon Scattering
similarity 0.95Arno Bargerbos et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Coherent control of a superconducting qubit with dynamically tunable qubit-cavity coupling
similarity 0.95A. J. Hoffman et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Distinguishing Parity-Switching Mechanisms in a Superconducting Qubit
similarity 0.95S. Diamond et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified