Compact vacuum-gap transmon qubits: Selective and sensitive probes for superconductor surface losses
M. Zemlicka, E. Redchenko, M. Peruzzo, F. Hassani, A. Trioni, S. Barzanjeh, J.M. Fink
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.20.044054 · Physical Review Applied
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
State-of-the-art transmon qubits rely on large capacitors, which systematically improve their coherence due to reduced surface-loss participation. However, this approach increases both the footprint and the parasitic cross-coupling and is ultimately limited by radiation losses—a potential roadblock for scaling up quantum processors to millions of qubits. In this work we present transmon qubits with sizes as low as 36×39μm2 with ≳100-nm-wide vacuum-gap capacitors that are micromachined from commercial silicon-on-insulator wafers and shadow evaporated with aluminum. We achieve a vacuum participation ratio up to 99.6% in an in-plane design that is compatible with standard coplanar circuits. Qubit relaxation-time measurements for small gaps with high zero-point electric field variance of up to 22 V/m reveal a double exponential decay indicating comparably strong qubit interaction with long-lived two-level systems. The exceptionally high selectivity of up to 20 dB to the superconductor-vacuum interface allows us to precisely back out the sub-single-photon dielectric loss tangent of aluminum oxide previously exposed to ambient conditions. In terms of future scaling potential, we achieve a ratio of qubit quality factor to a footprint area equal to 20μm−2, which is comparable with the highest T1 devices relying on larger geometries, a value that could improve substantially for lower surface-loss superconductors.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Al Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Superconducting on-chip spectrometer for mesoscopic quantum systems
similarity 0.94J. Griesmar et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Efficiency of quasiparticle evacuation in superconducting devices
similarity 0.93Sukumar Rajauria et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Insulator-to-superconductor transition in ultrathin films
similarity 0.93Y. Liu et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Probing hybridization of a single energy level coupled to superconducting leads
similarity 0.93D. M. T. van Zanten et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Phonon-mediated quasiparticle poisoning of superconducting microwave resonators
similarity 0.93U. Patel et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Localization, superconducting fluctuations, and superconductivity in thin films and narrow wires of aluminum
similarity 0.92P. Santhanam et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified