Why superconducting Ta qubits have fewer tunneling two-level systems at the vacuum-oxide interface than Nb qubits
Zhe Wang, Clare C. Yu, Ruqian Wu
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.23.024017 · Physical Review Applied
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Superconducting qubits are a key contender for quantum computing elements, but they often face challenges like noise and decoherence from two-level systems (TLSs). Tantalum (Ta) qubits are notable for their long T1 coherence times, nearing milliseconds, presumably due to fewer TLSs, though the cause of this is unclear. We explore this by analyzing the vacuum-oxide interface using density functional theory, particularly comparing Nb oxide (Nb2O5) and Ta oxide (Ta2O5). We discover that Ta2O5 forms a smoother surface with fewer dangling O atoms and structural TLSs than Nb2O5. The greater atomic mass of Ta also lowers the tunnel splittings of these structural TLSs below the qubit’s operating frequency. Furthermore, using external electric fields or SO2 passivation can significantly reduce defect-related TLSs on Nb surfaces, potentially improving their coherence times.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Ta Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Al Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Dynamics and energy distribution of nonequilibrium quasiparticles in superconducting tunnel junctions
similarity 0.94K. Segall et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Native-oxide-passivated trilayer junctions for superconducting qubits
similarity 0.94Pankaj Sethi et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Anomalous charge noise in superconducting qubits
similarity 0.93B. G. Christensen et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Modeling phonon-mediated quasiparticle poisoning in superconducting qubit arrays
similarity 0.93E. Yelton et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Hot Nonequilibrium Quasiparticles in Transmon Qubits
similarity 0.93K. Serniak et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Strong Nonlinear Response of Superconducting Tunnel Junctions due to Localized Traps
similarity 0.93A. Poelaert et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified