Combined spectroscopic imaging STM and ARPES study of different gaps measured in the cuprate phase diagram
K. Fujita, I. Drozdov, Z. Du, H. Li, S.-H. Joo, J. Lee, G. Gu, P. D. Johnson, T. Valla
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.045136 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
A comparative study of the gaps measured in two techniques, angle-resolved photoelectron spectroscopy and spectroscopic imaging scanning tunneling microscopy, is presented. In particular the study focuses on the more overdoped region of the cuprate phase diagram in the superconducting state. While the total densities of states measured in the two techniques agree very well, it is shown that the peak in the density of states, ΔDOS, is consistently displaced to higher energies relative to the maximal superconducting gap, Δ0, determined in photoemission. The difference between the two gaps is more evident for the less doped samples reflecting increased normalization of bands. This observation will clearly influence the boundaries in the phase diagrams of the cuprates defined by these two techniques.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 91 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 50 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 50 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 85 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Temperature and doping dependence of the Bi2.1Sr1.9CaCu2O8+δ pseudogap and superconducting gap
similarity 0.96Azusa Matsuda et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Optical perturbation of the hole pockets in the underdoped high-Tc superconducting cuprates
similarity 0.95S. Freutel et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Novel Anisotropy in the Superconducting Gap Structure of Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ Probed by Quasiparticle Heat Transport
similarity 0.95Yoichi Ando et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Ultrafast Gap Dynamics and Electronic Interactions in a Photoexcited Cuprate Superconductor
similarity 0.95S. Parham et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Cuprate phase diagram and the influence of nanoscale inhomogeneities
similarity 0.95N. Zaki et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Particle-Hole Asymmetry in the Cuprate Pseudogap Measured with Time-Resolved Spectroscopy
similarity 0.95Tristan L. Miller et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified