Cuprate phase diagram and the influence of nanoscale inhomogeneities
N. Zaki, H.-B. Yang, J. D. Rameau, P. D. Johnson, H. Claus, D. G. Hinks
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.195163 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The phase diagram associated with high-Tc superconductors is complicated by an array of different ground states. The parent material represents an antiferromagnetic insulator but with doping superconductivity becomes possible with transition temperatures previously thought unattainable. The underdoped region of the phase diagram is dominated by the so-called pseudogap phenomena, whereby in the normal state the system mimics superconductivity in its spectral response but does not show the complete loss of resistivity associated with the superconducting state. An understanding of this regime presents one of the great challenges for the field. In the present study we revisit the structure of the phase diagram as determined in photoemission studies. By careful analysis of the role of nanoscale inhomogeneities in the overdoped region, we are able to more carefully separate out the gaps due to the pseudogap phenomena from the gaps due to the superconducting transition. Within a mean-field description, we are thus able to link the magnitude of the doping-dependent pseudogap directly to the Heisenberg exchange interaction term, J∑sisj, contained in the t−J model. This approach provides a clear indication that the pseudogap is associated with spin singlet formation.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| La0.875Ba0.125CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Bi2Sr2CaCuO2+δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 80 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| YBa2Cu3Oy Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
The cuprate phase diagram and the influence of nanoscale inhomogeneities
similarity 0.99Nader Zaki et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1708.01558
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Particle-Hole Asymmetry in the Cuprate Pseudogap Measured with Time-Resolved Spectroscopy
similarity 0.95Tristan L. Miller et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Toward a unified magnetic phase diagram of the cuprate superconductors
similarity 0.95Alexander Sokol & David Pines
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Evolution of low-temperature phases in a low-temperature structural transition of a La cuprate
similarity 0.95Y. Inoue et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Combined spectroscopic imaging STM and ARPES study of different gaps measured in the cuprate phase diagram
similarity 0.95K. Fujita et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Unusual Layer-Dependent Charge Distribution, Collective Mode Coupling, and Superconductivity in Multilayer Cuprate Ba2Ca3Cu4O8F2
similarity 0.95Yulin Chen et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified