← Back to search

Single-gap versus two-gap scenario: Specific heat and thermodynamic critical field of the noncentrosymmetric superconductor BeAu

Rustem Khasanov, Ritu Gupta, Debarchan Das, Andreas Leithe-Jasper, Eteri Svanidze

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.102.014514 · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

Temperature evolutions of the electronic specific heat Ce(T) [A. Amon et al., Phys. Rev. B 97, 014501 (2018)] and the thermodynamic critical field Bc(T) [R. Khasanov et al., Phys. Rev. Research 2, 023142 (2020)] of the BeAu superconductor were reconsidered within the framework of the single-gap and two-gap scenarios. The analysis shows that the single-gap approach, by being able to describe satisfactorily the temperature dependence of Ce(T), fails in the case of Bc(T). The self-consistent two-gap model, in contrast, is able to describe both thermodynamic quantities by using a similar set of parameters. Our results imply that in some particular cases, such as in the case of BeAu, measurement of one single thermodynamic quantity may not be enough in order to speculate on the nature of the superconducting pairing mechanism.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
BeAu

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

3.29Pressure not reportedunknown
BeAu

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

3.233Pressure not reportedunknown
MgB2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers