← Back to search

Fully anisotropic superconductivity with few Helmholtz Fermi-surface harmonics

Jon Lafuente-Bartolome, Idoia G. Gurtubay, Asier Eiguren

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.102.161107 · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

We present an alternative representation for the anisotropic Eliashberg equations of superconductivity, whose numerical solution yields an efficiency gain of several orders of magnitude with respect to the conventional representation in momentum space. Our method is a practical realization of a long-sought approach, whose essence is a linear transformation from regular k space to a set of orthonormal functions defined as the solutions of the Helmholtz equation on the Fermi surface. In this way, all the anisotropy of the problem can be described by a handful of coefficients with built-in symmetry. We perform benchmark calculations on the gap anisotropy of MgB2, and reproduce previous results at a remarkably reduced computational cost. Furthermore, we apply our methodology to efficiently determine the transition temperature of the compressed YH6 hydride, obtaining very good agreement with recent experimental measurements. The simplification introduced by our method enables the high-throughput exploration of superconducting materials without having to resort to the isotropic approximation, and opens up possibilities towards first-principles calculations of more advanced theories of superconductivity.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
MgB2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

39Pressure unresolvedunknown
YH6

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—300 GPaunknown

Similar papers