Superconductivity in infinite-layer nickelates: Role of f orbitals
Subhadeep Bandyopadhyay, Priyo Adhikary, Tanmoy Das, Indra Dasgupta, Tanusri Saha-Dasgupta
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.102.220502 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Employing first-principles density functional theory calculations and Wannierization of the low-energy band structure, we analyze the electronic structure of undoped, infinite-layer nickelate compounds NdNiO2, PrNiO2, and LaNiO2. Our study reveals the important role of the nonzero f-ness of Nd and Pr atoms, as opposed to the f0 occupancy of La. The nonzero f-ness becomes effective in lowering the energy of the rare-earth 5d hybridized axial orbital, thereby enhancing the electron pockets and influencing the Fermi surface topology. The Fermi surface topology of NdNiO2 and PrNiO2 is strikingly similar, while differences are observed for LaNiO2. This difference shows up in computed doping-dependent superconducting properties of the three compounds within a weak coupling theory, which finds two-gap superconductivity for NdNiO2 and PrNiO2, and the possibility of a single-gap superconductivity for LaNiO2 with the strength of superconductivity suppressed by almost a factor of 2, compared to the Nd or Pr compound.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| NdNiO2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 12 | Pressure not reported | midpoint |
| PrNiO2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 9.5 | Pressure not reported | midpoint |
| LaNiO2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Charge order and superconductivity in a two-band model for infinite-layer nickelates
similarity 0.97Cheng Peng et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Optimizing Superconductivity: From Cuprates via Nickelates to Palladates
similarity 0.95Motoharu Kitatani et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Charged domain-wall dynamics in doped antiferromagnets and spin fluctuations in cuprate superconductors
similarity 0.94J. Zaanen et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetic penetration depth and Tc in superconducting nickelates
similarity 0.93F. Bernardini et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity in Infinite-layer Nickelates : Role of Non-zero f-ness
similarity 0.93Subhadeep Bandyopadhyay et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2010.02527
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electronic structure, dimer physics, orbital-selective behavior, and magnetic tendencies in the bilayer nickelate superconductor La3Ni2O7 under pressure
similarity 0.93Yang Zhang et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified