Charge order and superconductivity in a two-band model for infinite-layer nickelates
Cheng Peng, Hong-Chen Jiang, Brian Moritz, Thomas P. Devereaux, Chunjing Jia
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.108.245115 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The recent discovery of superconductivity in infinite-layer nickelates has drawn considerable attention; however, a consensus on the fundamental building blocks and common ingredients is necessary to understand and describe their ground states and emergent properties is lacking. A series of experimental and theoretical studies have suggested that an effective two-band Hubbard model with Ni 3dx2−y2 and rare-earth (R) 5d character may describe the low-energy physics. Here, we study the ground state properties of this two-band model on four-leg cylinders using the density-matrix renormalization group (DMRG) technique to better grasp whether such a simple model can embody the essential physics. A key difference compared to single-band Hubbard materials is that the system is self-doped: even at overall half-filling, the R band acts as an electron reservoir, hole doping the Ni layer, and fundamentally altering the physics expected from an undoped antiferromagnet. On the four-leg cylinder, the ground state is consistent with a Luttinger liquid, with antiphase modulations of the charge density in the Ni and R layers having corresponding wave vectors that lock together. Light hole doping away from half-filling releases the locking between the Ni and the R charge modulations, as the electron density in the R band decreases and eventually becomes exhausted at a hole doping concentration that depends sensitively on the effective splitting between the Ni and the R orbitals. The ground state of the doped system is consistent with a Luther-Emery liquid, possessing quasi-long-range superconducting correlations in the Ni layer, similar to the single-band Hubbard model. Our results are consistent with experimental observations and may help to reveal the microscopic mechanism for pairing and other emergent properties not only in the infinite-layer nickelates but also other unconventional superconductors.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| R1-xSrxNiO2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 10 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| LaNiO2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Microscopic theory of superconducting phase diagram in infinite-layer nickelates
similarity 0.97T. Y. Xie et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity in infinite-layer nickelates: Role of f orbitals
similarity 0.97Subhadeep Bandyopadhyay et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Topotactic Hydrogen in Nickelate Superconductors and Akin Infinite-Layer Oxides ABO2
similarity 0.94Liang Si et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Two-orbital model for possible superconductivity pairing mechanism in nickelates
similarity 0.94Chen Lu et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity in Trilayer Nickelate La4Ni3O10 under Pressure
similarity 0.94Mingxin Zhang et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Screening in a two-band model for superconducting infinite-layer nickelate
similarity 0.94Tharathep Plienbumrung et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified