Anomalous anisotropy of the lower critical field and Meissner effect in UTe2
C. Paulsen, G. Knebel, G. Lapertot, D. Braithwaite, A. Pourret, D. Aoki, F. Hardy, J. Flouquet, J.-P. Brison
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.L180501 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We report on low-temperature susceptibility and magnetization measurements made on single crystals of the recently discovered heavy-fermion superconductor UTe2 and compare the results with the two ambient pressure ferromagnetic superconductors URhGe and UCoGe. Hysteresis curves in the superconducting phase show a familiar diamond shape superimposed on a large paramagnetic background. The Meissner state was measured by zero-field cooling in small fields of a few Oe as well as ac susceptibility measurements in small fields and resulted in 100% shielding, with a sharp transition. However, the field-cooling Meissner-Ochsenfeld effect (expulsion of flux) was negligible in fields greater than just a few Oe, but becomes nearly 30% of the perfect diamagnetic signal when the field was reduced to 0.01 Oe. The critical current due to flux pinning was studied by ac susceptibility techniques. Over the range in fields and temperature of this study, no signature of a ferromagnetic transition could be discerned. The lower critical field Hc1 has been measured along the three crystallographic axes, and surprisingly, the anisotropy of Hc1 contradicts that of the upper critical field. We discuss this discrepancy and show that it may provide additional support for a magnetic field-dependent pairing mediated by ferromagnetic fluctuations in UTe2.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| UTe2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1.6 | Pressure unresolved | unknown |
| URhGe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0.25 | Pressure unresolved | unknown |
| UCoGe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0.8 | Pressure unresolved | unknown |
| UGe2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0.8 | 1.2 GPa | unknown |
Similar papers
Interplay between magnetism and superconductivity in UTe2
similarity 0.94Di S. Wei et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Meissner phases in spin-triplet ferromagnetic superconductors
similarity 0.94Diana V. Shopova & Dimo I. Uzunov
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electronic structures of ferromagnetic superconductors UGe2 and UCoGe studied by angle-resolved photoelectron spectroscopy
similarity 0.93Shin-ichi Fujimori et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Reinforcement of superconductivity by quantum critical fluctuations of metamagnetism in UTe2
similarity 0.93Y. Tokiwa et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Change of superconducting character in UTe2 induced by magnetic field
similarity 0.93K. Kinjo et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Coexistence of ferromagnetic fluctuations and superconductivity in the actinide superconductor UTe2
similarity 0.92Shyam Sundar et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified