Phenomenological model of the third-harmonic magnetic response due to superconducting fluctuations: Application to Sr2RuO4
Fei Chen, Damjan Pelc, Martin Greven, Rafael M. Fernandes
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.104.064502 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We employ the phenomenological Lawrence-Doniach model to compute the contributions of the superconducting fluctuations to the third-harmonic magnetic response, denoted here by M3¯, which can be measured in a precise way using ac magnetic fields and lock-in techniques. We show that, in an intermediate temperature regime, this quantity behaves as the third-order nonlinear susceptibility, which shows a power-law dependence with the reduced temperature ε=T−TcTc as ε−5/2. Very close to Tc, however, M3¯ saturates due to the nonzero amplitude of the ac field. We compare our theoretical results with experimental data for three conventional superconductors—lead, niobium, and vanadium—and for the unconventional superconductor Sr2RuO4 (SRO). We find good agreement between theory and experiment for the elemental superconductors, although the theoretical values for the critical field systematically deviate from the experimental ones. In the case of SRO, however, the phenomenological model completely fails to describe the data, as the third-harmonic response remains sizable over a much wider reduced temperature range compared to Pb, Nb, and V. We show that an inhomogeneous distribution of Tc across the sample can partially account for this discrepancy, since regions with a locally higher Tc contribute to the fluctuation M3¯ significantly more than regions with the “nominal” Tc of the clean system. However, the exponential temperature dependence of M3¯ first reported by Pelc et al. [Nat. Commun. 10, 2729 (2019)] is not captured by the model with inhomogeneity. We conclude that, while inhomogeneity is an important ingredient to understand the superconducting fluctuations of SRO and other perovskite superconductors, additional effects may be at play, such as non-Gaussian fluctuations or rare-region effects.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Sr2RuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| SrTiO3 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Interplay between magnetism and superconductivity in UTe2
similarity 0.95Di S. Wei et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spin susceptibility of nonunitary spin-triplet superconductors
similarity 0.95Thomas Bernat et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spin-Triplet Superconductivity due to Antiferromagnetic Spin-Fluctuation in Sr2RuO4
similarity 0.95Takeshi Kuwabara & Masao Ogata
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetoelectric effects and spin switching phenomena at the interface of chiral domains in spin-triplet superconductors
similarity 0.94Alfonso Romano et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electronic structure and spontaneous internal field around nonmagnetic impurities in spin-triplet chiral p-wave superconductors
similarity 0.94Mitsuaki Takigawa et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Conditions for orbital-selective altermagnetism in Sr2RuO4: Tight-binding model, similarities with cuprates, and implications for superconductivity
similarity 0.94Carmine Autieri et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified