Andreev reflection and Josephson effect in the α−T3 lattice
Xingfei Zhou
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.104.125441 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We investigate the Andreev reflection and the Josephson effect in the α−T3 lattice, which falls between graphene (α=0) and the dice lattice (α=1), by adjusting the parameter α. In the regime of the specular Andreev reflection, when the incident energy of the electron is small, the probability of Andreev reflection decreases as the parameter α increases. On the contrary, when the incident energy is large, the probability of Andreev reflection increases as the parameter α increases. Interestingly, when the incident energy approaches the superconducting energy gap function, the Andreev reflection with approximate all-angle perfect transmission happens in the case of α=1. In the regime of Andreev retroreflection, when the parameter α increases, the probability of Andreev reflection increases regardless of the value of incident energy. When the incident energy approaches the superconducting energy gap function, the Andreev reflection with approximate all-angle perfect transmission happens regardless of the value of α. We also give the differential conductance in these two regimes and find that it increases as the parameter α increases generally. In addition, the α−T3 lattice-based Josephson current increases as α increases. When the length of the junction approaches zero, the critical Josephson currents in the different values of α approach the same value.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hg1-xCdxTe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Enhanced Andreev Reflection in Flat-Band Systems: Wave Packet Dynamics, DC Transport and the Josephson Effect
similarity 0.89Sarbajit Mazumdar et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2507.06327
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Enhanced Andreev reflection in flat-band systems: Wave packet dynamics, dc transport, and the Josephson effect
similarity 0.88Sarbajit Mazumdar et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Andreev reflection in layered structures: Implications for high-Tc grain-boundary Josephson junctions
similarity 0.87Alexander Golubov & Francesco Tafuri
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Light-modulated Andreev effects in graphene-based superconducting junctions
similarity 0.87Miao Yu et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Andreev and normal reflections in gapped bilayer graphene–superconductor junctions
similarity 0.87Panch Ram et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Anisotropic Andreev Reflection and Josephson Effect in Ballistic Phosphorene
similarity 0.86Jacob Linder & Takehito Yokoyama · 2017 · arXiv:1702.06125
Source status unknown — claims are unverified