← Back to search

Effect of temperature oscillations on kinetic inductance and depairing in thin and narrow superconducting nanowire resonators

Jason P. Allmaras, Alexander G. Kozorezov, Marco Colangelo, Boris A. Korzh, Matthew D. Shaw, Karl K. Berggren

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.107.104520 · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

Recent experiments have demonstrated a method for extracting the depairing current of nanowires fabricated from thin-film dirty superconductors using the AC response of DC-current biased resonators. While the existing theoretical model for understanding this response, developed by Clem and Kogan, provides agreement with Eilenberger-Usadel theory at low temperatures, there is a systematic and substantial deviation from theory at elevated temperatures. We propose that the DC bias in the presence of electromagnetic oscillations leads to Joule heating in the superconductor. This heating, combined with the strong electron-electron scattering in these heavily disordered materials, leads to oscillations in the effective temperature of the superconductor which alter the kinetic inductance. In this work, we derive the expression for the shift in kinetic inductance in the presence of a bias current and demonstrate that this model provides a significantly improved agreement between experiment and theory.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
NbN

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

8.65Pressure not reportedunknown
WSi

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

3.5Pressure not reportedunknown
WSi

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

2Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers