Constraints on a split superconducting transition under uniaxial strain in Sr2RuO4 from scanning SQUID microscopy
Eli Mueller, Yusuke Iguchi, Christopher Watson, Clifford W. Hicks, Yoshiteru Maeno, Kathryn A. Moler
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.108.144501 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
More than two decades after the discovery of superconductivity in Sr2RuO4, it is still unclear whether the order parameter has a single component or two degenerate components. For any two-component scenario, application of uniaxial strain is expected to lift the degeneracy, generating two distinct phase transitions. The presence of a second (lower-temperature) transition may be observable by probes that are sensitive to changes in the London penetration depth, λ, as a function of temperature, T. Here, we use scanning SQUID microscopy combined with a uniaxial strain device to test for a second transition under strain. We only observe a single transition. Within the temperature range where a second transition has been suggested by μSR measurements [Grinenko et al., Nat. Phys. 17, 748 (2021)], we further place a tight upper bound of less than 1% on the change in the zero temperature superfluid density ns∝λ−2(0) due to a second transition, suggesting that such a transition does not occur. These results constrain theories of the order parameter in Sr2RuO4.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sr2RuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1.5 | Pressure unresolved | onset |
Similar papers
Limits on superconductivity-related magnetization in Sr2RuO4 and PrOs4Sb12 from scanning SQUID microscopy
similarity 0.97Clifford W. Hicks et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity in Sr2RuO4 thin films under biaxial strain
similarity 0.96Yuan-Chun Liu et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Perturbation theory analysis of the strain-dependent superconducting phase diagram for Sr2RuO4
similarity 0.96J. J. Deisz
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Enhancement of Superconductivity of Sr2RuO4 to 3 K by Embedded Metallic Microdomains
similarity 0.96Y. Maeno et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Higher-Tc superconducting phase in Sr2RuO4 induced by uniaxial pressure
similarity 0.96Shunichiro Kittaka et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Frequency-dependent superconducting states from the two-time linear response theory: Application to Sr2RuO4
similarity 0.96Olivier Gingras et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified