← Back to search

Limits on superconductivity-related magnetization in Sr2RuO4 and PrOs4Sb12 from scanning SQUID microscopy

Clifford W. Hicks, John R. Kirtley, Thomas M. Lippman, Nicholas C. Koshnick, Martin E. Huber, Yoshiteru Maeno, William M. Yuhasz, M. Brian Maple, Kathryn A. Moler

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.214501 · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

We present scanning superconducting quantum interference device microscopy data on the superconductors Sr2RuO4(Tc=1.5 K) and PrOs4Sb12(Tc=1.8 K). In both of these materials, superconductivity-related time-reversal symmetry-breaking fields have been observed by muon spin rotation; our aim was to visualize the structure of these fields. However, in neither Sr2RuO4 nor PrOs4Sb12 do we observe spontaneous superconductivity-related magnetization. In Sr2RuO4, many experimental results have been interpreted on the basis of a px±ipy superconducting order parameter. This order parameter is expected to give spontaneous magnetic induction at sample edges and order parameter domain walls. Supposing large domains, our data restrict domain wall and edge fields to no more than ∼0.1% and ∼0.2% of the expected magnitude, respectively. Alternatively, if the magnetization is of the expected order, the typical domain size is limited to ∼30 nm for random domains or ∼500 nm for periodic domains.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
Sr2RuO4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

1.5Pressure not reportedunknown
PrOs4Sb12

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

1.8Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers