Impedance of radio-frequency-biased resistive superconducting quantum interference devices
R. J. Soulen, Jr., Deborah Van Vechten
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.36.239 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We have measured with high accuracy (100 ppm) and high precision (5–10 ppm) the impedance of a rf-driven resistive superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) as a function of the amplitude and frequency of the radio-frequency (rf) bias, as a function of the current bias, and as a function of several other circuit parameters. We have developed the coupled differential equations for the resistive SQUID and for the rf tank circuit. The fit of the solutions of these equations to the data for nonhysteretic junctions is excellent. We were unable to develop solutions for the hysteretic case and thus simply present examples of typical data obtained in order to illustrate the differences with the nonhysteretic case. The relationship of this study to noise thermometry using resistive SQUID’s is indicated.
Similar papers
Measurement of the effective dissipation in an rf SQUID system
similarity 0.89B. Ruggiero et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Parametric resonance in tunable superconducting cavities
similarity 0.88Waltraut Wustmann & Vitaly Shumeiko
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Decoherence in rf SQUID Qubits
similarity 0.88Douglas A. Bennett et al. · 2008 · arXiv:0811.2268
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting quantum interference device with frequency-dependent damping: Readout of flux qubits
similarity 0.88T. L. Robertson et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Intermodulation in nonlinear SQUID metamaterials: Experiment and theory
similarity 0.88Daimeng Zhang et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Transient Dynamics of a Superconducting Nonlinear Oscillator
similarity 0.88P. Bhupathi et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified