← Back to search

Superconductivity in sulfur-containing R-Ba-Cu-O compounds

R. Gagnon, P. Fournier, M. Aubin, A. H. O'Reilly, J. E. Greedan

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.39.11498 · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

We have prepared samples of RBa2Cu3OγSy (R=Y,Er,Nd) and studied them by x-ray powder diffraction, dc resistivity, and thermoelectric power measurements. All the compounds present a large proportion of secondary phases which are dominated by BaSO4, as confirmed by the x-ray-diffraction patterns. Samples with R=YorEr are still high-temperature superconductors confirming the fact that the sulfur atoms are not inserted, or with a very low proportion, in the 1:2:3 phase. In contrast, for the R=Nd samples, a semiconducting behavior is observed. A gradual transition from an orthorhombic to a tetragonal structure is obtained as the sulfur content is increased in NdBa2Cu3OγSy (0≤y≤1). This is not due to a sulfur insertion in the 1:2:3 phase. In fact, this phase is Ba deficient because of the formation of BaSO4 and some of the Nd substitutes for Ba in the 1:2:3 phase. That is, the resulting perovskitelike composition is Nd(Ba2−xNdx)Cu3O7+δ. This interpretation is consistent with a previous study of the solid solubility in the R(Ba2−xRx)Cu3O7+δ systems.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
YBa2Cu3O7

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

90Pressure not reportedunknown
ErBa2Cu3O7

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

90Pressure not reportedunknown
NdBa2Cu3O7

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers