← Back to search

Reply to "Comment on `Identification of a superoxide in superconducting La2CuO4+δ by x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy"'

J. W. Rogers, Jr., N. D. Shinn, J. E. Schirber, E. L. Venturini, D. S. Ginley, B. Morosin

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.39.12334 · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

New and interesting results are presented which complement our previously published conclusions on the presence of a superoxide phase in the near-surface region of superconducting ceramic lanthanum cuprate. Although we disagree with some of the data interpretation of Zhou, Sinha, and Goodenough [this issue, Phys. Rev. B 39, 12331 (1989)] their Comment nevertheless emphasizes the difficulties in determining the species responsible for the observed superconductivity in the absence of a direct spectroscopic probe of excess oxygen in the bulk material.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
La2CuO4+δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

30Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers